May 7, 2011

Osama bin Laden is Dead

Many people have had strong reactions to US President Obama's announcement of Osama bin Laden's death. Many others, including myself, have had strong reactions to these reactions. This is an extremely sensitive topic, especially for people impacted by 9/11. However, sensitive issues are usually those that require the most reflection. And Osama bin Laden's death and America's reaction to it should be contemplated.

Many have suggested that relief would have been more appropriate than jubilant celebration. Many left-leaning folks have been criticized for rejoicing in death. I feel the need to clarify that I am not an apologist for bin Laden or any other terrorist. I have the deepest sympathy for any and all people who lost loved ones on September 11, 2001 and in any subsequent military operations. However, just because 9/11 was wrong, it does not make military action or retaliation right.

I have been troubled by the lack of recognition for the context and history of bin Laden and US foreign policy by the general American population and mainstream media. Putting aside the controversy surrounding the 1979 US funding bin Laden and other militants against the Soviets in Afghanistan, there remain several problematic aspects to the decade-long "War on Terror" and its casualties. I have also been troubled by the assertion that the "War on Terror" will continue, made by both Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton:


Here at the State Department, we have worked to forge a worldwide anti-terror network. We have drawn together the effort and energy of friends, partners, and allies on every continent. Our partnerships, including our close cooperation with Pakistan, have helped put unprecedented pressure on al-Qaida and its leadership. Continued cooperation will be just as important in the days ahead, because even as we mark this milestone, we should not forget that the battle to stop al-Qaida and its syndicate of terror will not end with the death of bin Ladin.

Indeed, we must take this opportunity to renew our resolve and redouble our efforts. In Afghanistan, we will continue taking the fight to al-Qaida and their Taliban allies, while working to support the Afghan people as they build a stronger government and begin to take responsibility for their own security.  

According to Unknown News, based on the "lowest credible estimates," over 19,500 people have been killed and over 48,500 people have been injured in the Afghan War. Obviously, only one of those killed was bin Laden, but thousands of those killed were Afghan civilians. Does the end (bin Laden's death), justify the means (the deaths of thousands)? This includes thousands of Afghans AND Americans, as well as journalists and coalition forces, especially from the UK, Canada, France and Germany. Not to mention the numerous soldiers and others impacted physically and mentally, suffering from PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), physical disabilities, committing suicide, or grieving their loved ones.


Russell Hodin
NEW TIMES San Luis Obispo

May 5, 2011

Obviously, the loss of American lives on 9/11 was tragic, but shouldn't death prompt reflection on life? Can we not use war and terror as an opportunity to reflect on, and strive for, peace?

The big picture of the war is important. But the big picture of the terrorist attacks of 9/11 is also crucial to understanding this conflict. When I heard about the World Trade Center (WTC) attacks in New York, I was horrified. But in the aftermath, I hoped that a faint silver lining might be a time of national reflection for Americans, to ask: Why do people want to attack our country? What does the attack on the WTC signify?

When this type of reflection did not reach the White House, I hoped that at least other government officials and media outlets would question whether or not fighting fire with fire (or violence with violence... or terror with terror) would be wise.

There was one voice in government, Rep. Barbara Lee, that offered that wisdom:



There was another voice that ended up on FOX News' The O'Reilly Factor and managed to make the point that I'm trying to make before O'Reilly unprofessionally said "cut his mic" and moved on.




By Eneko in Diagonal PeriĆ³dico
Sam Husseini kept asking important questions that were dismissed in the rush to go to war. Won't we also kill women and children? Won't we cause civilian casualties? Who is "Them"?

Them (noun): Not us; the Other.

This short chapter by Andrea Smith (worth reading the whole 8 pages!) clearly explains how the significance of War against the Other and is worth quoting at length:
Orientalism/War
A third pillar of white supremacy is the logic of Orientalism. Orientalism was defined by Edward Said as the process of the West defining itself as a superior civilization by constructing itself in opposition to an "exotic" but inferior "Orient." (Here I am using the term "Orientalism" more broadly than to solely signify what has been historically named as the Orient or Asia.) The logic of Orientalism marks certain peoples or nations as inferior and as posing a constant threat to the well-being of empire. These peoples are still seen as "civilizations"-they are not property [i.e. slaves] or "disappeared" [i.e. indigenous peoples] - however, they will always be imaged as permanent foreign threats to empire. This logic is evident in the anti-immigration movements within the United States that target immigrants of color. It does not matter how long immigrants of color reside in the United States, they generally become targeted as foreign threats, particularly during war time. Consequently, Orientalism serves as the anchor for war, because it allows the United States to justify being in a constant state of war to protect itself from its enemies.
Ridiculous discussions about "terror babies," babies born and raised as terrorists/American citizens, and widespread Islamaphobia, have become routine in the US over the past decade.

Trigger Warning: this video will likely make you angry. It contains so much misdirected hatred and unacceptable verbal attacks on Muslim-Americans, from both politicians and citizens.



If this isn't terrorism, then I'm not sure I know what terrorism is.



So, let's connect this to bin Laden's death. This graffiti, vandalizing a mosque in Maine, reads:

OSAMA TODAY ISLAM TOMOR[R]OW

via Valerie Kau



Ultimately, 9/11 didn't prompt enough reflection on why people in other parts of the world have strong negative feelings toward the US. Strong enough to incite terrorist attacks. And there definitely wasn't enough reflection on how military combat might foster even more hatred for the US government.

Rather than reflecting on US foreign policy, let's reflect on those killed in the wake of the 9/11 terrorist attacks and try to contemplate what alternative paths the US could have taken. Can we imagine a post 9/11 world without so many casualties of war, without nations bankrupted and destroyed by wars (financially, physically, psychologically, ...), and without people celebrating death?

via Palousitics

via GRIID

via Roger Hollander

via After America

The justification for the Afghanistan War is that their country was harbouring terrorists responsible for the fatal attacks against American citizens. There were people who used this type of logic to justify the 9/11 attacks (for example, feeling harmed by US foreign policy, military interventions or economic hegemony). In the decade since 9/11, there are definitely people that feel directly assaulted by the US military. Obviously, they will not all become terrorists. That is preposterous. But, the pain in the faces of the civilians in the photos above will not disappear overnight, if ever. And the effects of this war, on Americans, Afghans, Canadians, and many others, will continue for many years to come in the bodies, hearts, minds and communities affected by this war.


Let's work for peace and justice. There are ways to get involved in Canada, the US, or online.



Give Peace A Chance
by John Lennon
Ev'rybody's talkin' 'bout
Bagism, Shagism, Dragism, Madism, Ragism, Tagism
This-ism, that-ism, ism ism ism
All we are saying is give peace a chance
All we are saying is give peace a chance
(C'mon)
Ev'rybody's talkin' 'bout
Minister, Sinister, Banisters and Canisters,
Bishops, Fishops, Rabbis, and Pop Eyes, Bye bye, Bye byes
All we are saying is give peace a chance
All we are saying is give peace a chance
(Let me tell you now)
Ev'rybody's talkin' 'bout
Revolution, Evolution, Masturbation, Flagellation, Regulation,
Integrations, mediations, United Nations, congratulations
All we are saying is give peace a chance
All we are saying is give peace a chance
Ev'rybody's talkin' 'bout
John and Yoko, Timmy Leary, Rosemary,
Tommy Smothers, Bobby Dylan, Tommy Cooper,
Derek Taylor, Norman Mailer, Alan Ginsberg, Hare Krishna
Hare Hare Krishna
All we are saying is give peace a chance
All we are saying is give peace a chance

No comments:

Post a Comment